Move 37

In March 2016, a computer program made a move in Go that three thousand years of theory said was wrong. The world champion left the room. A reflection on Genesis 3:1–13.

Move 37
Photo by Elena Popova / Unsplash

Genesis 3:1–13

Phrases that spoke to me today:
• did God actually say you shall not eat of any tree in the garden
• you will not die
• God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened
• where are you

Applying the Word to My Life:
In March 2016, an AI program called AlphaGo played the 37th move of a match against Lee Sedol, then one of the strongest Go players in the world. The move placed a stone on the fifth line — a position that three thousand years of accumulated Go theory said was simply not played at that point in the game. The English-language commentator squinted at his screen to check whether the display was correct. Lee Sedol got up and left the room. He came back fifteen minutes later and took another fifteen minutes to make his next move. He was, by his own admission, shaken in a way no human opponent had ever shaken him.

By every available human heuristic, the move was wrong. The commentators thought it was a mistake. The world champion thought it was a mistake. AlphaGo played it anyway — because it had worked through consequences that no human player could hold in their head at once. Many moves later, the stone placed on the fifth line came to dominate the center of the board. Lee Sedol resigned the game. Move 37 was not a mistake. It just looked like one from where everyone was standing.

God plays Move 37. He sees consequences we cannot. He works from a perspective on the game we have never had — the full arc of a life, the full weight of a choice, the full cost of what looks good right now. When His answer is no, it often looks like Move 37 — the wrong call by every available measure, the move we will leave the room over. He makes it anyway.

The serpent in Genesis 3 understood something important: the way to move someone toward the wrong choice is not to point them at it. It is to convince them that God is making the wrong one.

He did not walk into the garden pointing at the fruit. He went for the trust first. Did God really tell you not to eat from any of these trees? — the attack on what God actually said. Then: you will not die — the attack on God's truthfulness. Then the move he had been building toward all along: God knows that when you eat the fruit, your eyes will be opened. You will be like Him. He knows what it would give you, and He is keeping it from you.

The doubt had to come before the desire. By the time Eve looked at the fruit and saw that it was good, that it would make her wise, the serpent had already reframed the entire question: Is your God really the good and loving father that you claim He is? Or is what you really need just out of reach — and He is standing between you and it?

She played the move that looked right from where she was standing. She could not see what was coming.

I spent a good portion of my life chasing security and comfort through my career and accomplishments. The logic seemed sound — work harder, build something solid, get to the place where things feel stable. But absolute security always seemed like it was just around the next corner. Another milestone, another achievement, and still not quite there. That is the problem when you rely on yourself, or even on the people around you. As close as it might seem, you never really arrive, and what you build never really lasts.

The serpent's argument was the one I was living: what you need is just out of reach. Get there yourself. God is not quite the answer for this particular thing.

Everyone wants to be happy. That desire is not the problem — it is what we were made for. The question is where we go to find it. The serpent did not offer Eve something trivial. He offered her wisdom, everything she did not have yet. He was promising happiness. He just didn't tell her what it was going to cost.

When He says no, it is often Move 37 — the answer that looks wrong by every available measure, the move we will leave the room over. He can see what we cannot. The question left for us is whether we trust that and let it go, or trust ourselves and play our own move.

After the apple, they hid. God came walking in the garden and called out: where are you?

It is not a geographic question. God knew exactly where Adam was. The question is relational — what happened to us? Where did you go?

If Eve had known what was coming — the full weight of what the apple would cost — the brief happiness would not have been worth the trade. She could not see it from where she was standing. Neither can we. That is why His answer deserves a second look. Odds are it is His Move 37.

My Response for Today:
Today I will name one place where I am living the serpent's argument — that what I need is just out of reach — and give it to God.